[928uk] Thrust Bearing Failure
marton
marton at sunrise.ch
Sun Feb 19 19:22:09 UTC 2012
Hi Graham
So far as I know these big sprockets lose their surface hardening as
regular wear & tear; not linked to belt tightness.
When I changed my cam belt I had to change these sprockets & the oil
gear - I could get a non-aluminium version of this one.
Good Luck
On 19/02/2012 19:35, go928 wrote:
> Hi Marton,
> The big sprockets.
> Regards.
> Graham.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* 928uk-bounces at lists.928.org.uk
> [mailto:928uk-bounces at lists.928.org.uk] *On Behalf Of *marton
> *Sent:* 19 February 2012 17:52
> *To:* 928uk at lists.928.org.uk
> *Subject:* Re: [928uk] Thrust Bearing Failure
>
> Very sorry to hear this.
>
> I think it will be hard to go after the firm because Porsche never
> really admitted the flex plate was the cause of the TBF so where
> is your expert witness?
>
> About cam belt rollers are damaged due to overtensioning of the
> belt - which rollers do you mean exactly?
>
>
>
> "On 19/02/2012 18:19, go928 wrote:
>>
>> Late last year my S4 auto suffered terminal tbf - the engine is
>> probably a write-off.
>>
>> Briefly, I've owned the car about 10 years, covering about 6,000
>> miles a year. She has 130k on the clock. Throughout the last 10
>> years she has been maintained and serviced annually by the same
>> firm and a flex plate check has been specified at each service.
>> Over the last couple of years I have had a series of problems
>> with difficulty starting, stalling and uneven running. She has
>> been back to the specialist on a number of occasions and fuel
>> pump, MAF and ISV among other things have all been replaced.
>> Each time the immediate problem has been resolved, but the car
>> was not running quite right, although it was hard to say
>> precisely why. I now suspect this was early symptoms of the
>> pending failure.
>>
>> My view is that the Porsche specialists who look after the car
>> should bear some responsibility, but they do not agree and have
>> washed their hands of my situation. Maybe I am not being as
>> objective as I should be so I would welcome any thoughts.
>>
>> My reasons for blaming the firm who looked after the car are:
>>
>> * Everything I have read about tbf seems to suggest it is
>> unheard of where the flex plate has been checked and released
>> regularly.
>> * The engine finally seized only about 2,000 miles after the
>> last service/flex plate check.
>> * When the tbf was diagnosed (by a different firm) the pinch
>> bolt was only finger tight.
>> * The firm admit that they do not change the pinch bolt when
>> they check the flex plate.
>> * The cam belt rollers are damaged due to overtensioning of the
>> belt. (As they have changed the cambelt twice since I
>> acquired the car, to my mind, even if they didn't cause the
>> damage they should have spotted it and changed the rollers).
>> * ATF in the diff.
>>
>> The last two points have no direct bearing (ha ha) on the thrust
>> bearing failure, but do indicate a questionable level of care.
>>
>> My questions:
>>
>> * Is it fair to pursue the firm for a contribution towards the
>> cost or should I accept (as they claim) that the thrust
>> bearing can fail at any time, even if the flex plate is
>> regularly checked?
>> * If I do have a claim, any thoughts on how best to get them to
>> do the decent thing? I will take them to court if necessary
>> but would prefer to avoid all the hassle if possible.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Graham
>> (91 S4 auto)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 928uk mailing list
>> 928uk at lists.928.org.uk
>> http://lists.928.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/928uk
>
>
> --
> Rheinstrasse 2
> 8193 Eglisau
> Switzerland
>
> +41 44 867 4074
>
--
Rheinstrasse 2
8193 Eglisau
Switzerland
+41 44 867 4074
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.928.org.uk/pipermail/928uk/attachments/20120219/ea3a01e8/attachment.htm>
More information about the 928uk
mailing list