[928uk] Random question

[Ian Salisbury]

Thats the issue Ben - we are struggling to locate the production number of individual cars - the only known place is the ID label in the boot - Porsche did not even put it in the owners service manual which is a similar label but without the production number!! The label can be done without it, using info from the one in the manual. There was an idea that it also appeared under the dash, hand written on the car frame - but I have not seen or had that confirmed.

Ian Salisbury
07748750084

> On 1 Nov 2020, at 18:17, Ben Hodges <benhodges1975 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Just being OCD Ian. As the car was in a bad state theres not much original stuff left! I wasn’t planning on going mad but as some of the paint is scratch through to the metal in the boot some form is repair is required. I’ll prob just do local repairs on it to make good.
> 
> That sticker has long gone so I’d be interested in getting one made up if you let me know what’s required.
> 
> Cheers
> Ben
> 
>> On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 at 17:13, Ian Salisbury <ian at salisburyassociates.co.uk> wrote:
>> Im sure its some form of sealant. As for “tidying” -  why? Its original and covered with foam and carpet! Why bother if its just age? Nothing wrong with that originality. But if its that bad you could fill with new sealer and rattle can to blend in, or worst case strip and redo all the bad stuff!! There should be sticker in the boot also. A white square label - this is the sticker which has a unique build number on it. Lots are lost to water damage as they are just paper. If you have it protect it - I spent ages generating fonts to replicate these - worst case I can create replicas which Ive done for a few people!
>> 
>> Ian Salisbury
>> 07748750084
>> 
>>>> On 1 Nov 2020, at 16:58, Ben Hodges <benhodges1975 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Adrian
>>> 
>>> Thanks for looking!
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Ben
>>> 
>>>> On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 at 16:53, Adrian Langford <adrian.langford at qualitative.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Hi Ben
>>>> 
>>>> Just checked mine (MY91 S4 Amazon Green S4).
>>>> 
>>>> I’d never noticed before, but yes it’s thin matt black paint there!
>>>> 
>>>> Adrian
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 1 Nov 2020, at 16:27, Ben Hodges via 928uk <928uk at lists.928.org.uk> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: Ben Hodges <benhodges1975 at gmail.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [928uk] Random question
>>>>> Date: 1 November 2020 16:27:37 GMT
>>>>> To: Ian Salisbury <ian at salisburyassociates.co.uk>
>>>>> Cc: phil rick <philrickse at gmail.com>, 928 List <928uk at lists.928.org.uk>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Ian
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mine appears to be quite a thin coating - more like a matt paint than a sealer. Is yours different?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Ben
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 at 16:12, Ian Salisbury <ian at salisburyassociates.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> I thought the black was a sealer over the body colour?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ian Salisbury
>>>>>> 07748750084
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2020, at 16:10, Ben Hodges <benhodges1975 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks Phil
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Mine is black but it’s over the body colour (red) as there are patches viable here and there so couldn't tell if it was a PO modification!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Couple of votes for black from others too so i guess that answers my question!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> Ben
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 at 15:30, phil rick <philrickse at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> my 90GT is black behind the tool tray, body colour was red.
>>>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>>>> Phil
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 3:23 PM Ben Hodges via 928uk <928uk at lists.928.org.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Working through the mess of an interior on my 82...
>>>>>>>>> Quick question - should the area behind the tool tray be body colour or black? I’m guessing body colour?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>> Ben
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.928.org.uk/pipermail/928uk/attachments/20201101/5fcafe0e/attachment.htm>